Bankruptcy in Malaysia
-
Courtesy of: iMoney.my
http://www.imoney.my/articles/bankruptcy/?utm_source=outbrain&utm_medium=CPC&utm_campaign=Traffic_MY_all_RSS
A reminder to update Picasa
-
*We just updated Picasa. To ensure that sharing to Google+ still works,
please update to the latest version or turn on automatic updates. Thanks,
and happy...
Picasa 3.9: Now with Google+ sharing and tagging
-
Posted by Chandrashekar Raghavan, Product Manager
Picasa 3.9, the latest update to the Picasa client, is ready for you to try
out! This update includes Goo...
With election season upon us, and a near constant stream of public jabs and rebuttals between incumbents and their challengers, we should focus on something besides the Americans that are running for office. Instead, let’s turn our attention to a rather peculiar set of state laws relating to elections and nonreligious Americans.
It’s well known that there aren’t many open atheists in Congress or in state government, and that atheists aren’t held in high esteem by potential voters. Some question our dedication to what they view as a “Christian nation” while others feel that they can’t relate to a candidate who doesn’t share the same faith as they do.
Whatever the reason, public distrust isn’t the only means by which atheists are discouraged for running from office. In fact, running for a spot in state legislatures as an atheist is outright illegal in some states. Obviously, these laws are trumped by the “No Religious Test Clause” of the United States Constitution, which is found in Article VI, paragraph 3, and states that:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
However, these laws are still on the books and have given atheist candidates trouble in the past. Cecil Bothwell, an atheist who in 2009 won an election for a Asheville, North Carolina city council seat, was almost unseated by local critics who pointed to a provision in North Carolina’s constitution that prohibited nonbelievers from being elected. This provision of the state constitution is similar to provisions in Arkansas, Maryland, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. The provisions follow:
A Better Google Analytics Alternative
-
[image: Fullres]
Our recent migration to GA4 left a lot to be desired and led us to explore
for better google analytics alternatives. We tried just about...
Dos vs Don’ts on Social Media in 2016
-
Since social media comes to our life, it has changed the way people
connect, discover, and share information dramatically. It is really nothing
more than p...
Responsive Design is a Kind of Big Deal
-
Did you know that if your website doesn’t have a responsive design, which
means the content doesn’t adapt to a variety of screen sizes, your SEO
efforts ...
Aliens From Hell - Freeman at Conspiracy Con 2013
-
What occult practices have the Nazis, and now NASA, employed to communicate
and channel entities into our dimension. What is the real purpose of the
billio...
Bankruptcy in Malaysia
-
Courtesy of: iMoney.my
http://www.imoney.my/articles/bankruptcy/?utm_source=outbrain&utm_medium=CPC&utm_campaign=Traffic_MY_all_RSS
A reminder to update Picasa
-
*We just updated Picasa. To ensure that sharing to Google+ still works,
please update to the latest version or turn on automatic updates. Thanks,
and happy...
Improvements to the Blogger template HTML editor
-
Posted by: +Samantha Schaffer and +Renee Kwang, Software Engineer Interns.
Whether you’re a web developer who builds blog templates for a living, or a
web...
Picasa 3.9: Now with Google+ sharing and tagging
-
Posted by Chandrashekar Raghavan, Product Manager
Picasa 3.9, the latest update to the Picasa client, is ready for you to try
out! This update includes Goo...
Appointment Scheduling Gadget
-
From our awesome friends at DaringLabs.
[image: Powered by Google App Engine]
Yes, I want to book appointments from my blog!
Use your blog to drum up ...
GOD LESS ATHEISTS ...By Matthew Bulger
ReplyDeleteWith election season upon us, and a near constant stream of public jabs and rebuttals between incumbents and their challengers, we should focus on something besides the Americans that are running for office. Instead, let’s turn our attention to a rather peculiar set of state laws relating to elections and nonreligious Americans.
It’s well known that there aren’t many open atheists in Congress or in state government, and that atheists aren’t held in high esteem by potential voters. Some question our dedication to what they view as a “Christian nation” while others feel that they can’t relate to a candidate who doesn’t share the same faith as they do.
Whatever the reason, public distrust isn’t the only means by which atheists are discouraged for running from office. In fact, running for a spot in state legislatures as an atheist is outright illegal in some states. Obviously, these laws are trumped by the “No Religious Test Clause” of the United States Constitution, which is found in Article VI, paragraph 3, and states that:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
However, these laws are still on the books and have given atheist candidates trouble in the past. Cecil Bothwell, an atheist who in 2009 won an election for a Asheville, North Carolina city council seat, was almost unseated by local critics who pointed to a provision in North Carolina’s constitution that prohibited nonbelievers from being elected. This provision of the state constitution is similar to provisions in Arkansas, Maryland, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. The provisions follow: